HackerPapers

arXiv:2606.12790cs.CL

GENIE: A Fine-Grained Measure for Novelty

Ramya Namuduri, Manya Wadhwa, Anshun Asher Zheng, Greg Durrett, Junyi Jessy Li

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Large Language Models have consistently demonstrated a lack of creativity and diversity across tasks. Prior work has focused on addressing whether models are capable of generating creative outputs. Here, we aim to consider novelty and investigate what makes model-generated content novel or not novel in a task-specific manner. We propose a fine-grained evaluation metric GENIE to measure the novelty of responses along task-specific features with respect to a population of responses. We show that unlike GENIE, holistic metrics struggle to capture the high-dimensionality of novelty and do not provide insight on which properties they target. Finally, we use GENIE to measure the effectiveness of mitigation methods that address creativity to better understand where these methods can improve novelty.

arXiv comments
Accepted to EMNLP Main Conference (2026)
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CLComputation and Language

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Oct 2026 to Oct 2026.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • That second "Mind the Gap" paper seems to be doing something very much like that, though their "conformative decoding" (CD) seems very simple: they make both the RLHFed and the base model produce a probability distribution for a given context, then apply top-p truncation to the…

      stratos123View on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.