HackerPapers

arXiv:2303.08774cs.CL

GPT-4 Technical Report

OpenAI, Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, Red Avila, Igor Babuschkin, Suchir Balaji, Valerie Balcom, Paul Baltescu, Haiming Bao, Mohammad Bavarian, Jeff Belgum, Irwan Bello, Jake Berdine, Gabriel Bernadett-Shapiro, Christopher Berner, Lenny Bogdonoff, Oleg Boiko, Madelaine Boyd, Anna-Luisa Brakman, Greg Brockman, Tim Brooks, Miles Brundage, Kevin Button, Trevor Cai, Rosie Campbell, Andrew Cann, Brittany Carey, Chelsea Carlson, Rory Carmichael, Brooke Chan, Che Chang, Fotis Chantzis, Derek Chen, Sully Chen, Ruby Chen, Jason Chen, Mark Chen, Ben Chess, Chester Cho, Casey Chu, Hyung Won Chung, Dave Cummings, Jeremiah Currier, Yunxing Dai, Cory Decareaux, Thomas Degry, Noah Deutsch, Damien Deville, Arka Dhar, David Dohan, Steve Dowling, Sheila Dunning, Adrien Ecoffet, Atty Eleti, Tyna Eloundou, David Farhi, Liam Fedus, Niko Felix, Simón Posada Fishman, Juston Forte, Isabella Fulford, Leo Gao, Elie Georges, Christian Gibson, Vik Goel, Tarun Gogineni, Gabriel Goh, Rapha Gontijo-Lopes, Jonathan Gordon, Morgan Grafstein, Scott Gray, Ryan Greene, Joshua Gross, Shixiang Shane Gu, Yufei Guo, Chris Hallacy, Jesse Han, Jeff Harris, Yuchen He, Mike Heaton, Johannes Heidecke, Chris Hesse, Alan Hickey, Wade Hickey, Peter Hoeschele, Brandon Houghton, Kenny Hsu, Shengli Hu, Xin Hu, Joost Huizinga, Shantanu Jain, Shawn Jain, Joanne Jang, Angela Jiang, Roger Jiang, Haozhun Jin, Denny Jin, Shino Jomoto, Billie Jonn, Heewoo Jun, Tomer Kaftan, Łukasz Kaiser, Ali Kamali, Ingmar Kanitscheider, Nitish Shirish Keskar, Tabarak Khan, Logan Kilpatrick, Jong Wook Kim, Christina Kim, Yongjik Kim, Jan Hendrik Kirchner, Jamie Kiros, Matt Knight, Daniel Kokotajlo, Łukasz Kondraciuk, Andrew Kondrich, Aris Konstantinidis, Kyle Kosic, Gretchen Krueger, Vishal Kuo, Michael Lampe, Ikai Lan, Teddy Lee, Jan Leike, Jade Leung, Daniel Levy, Chak Ming Li, Rachel Lim, Molly Lin, Stephanie Lin, Mateusz Litwin, Theresa Lopez, Ryan Lowe, Patricia Lue, Anna Makanju, Kim Malfacini, Sam Manning, Todor Markov, Yaniv Markovski, Bianca Martin, Katie Mayer, Andrew Mayne, Bob McGrew, Scott Mayer McKinney, Christine McLeavey, Paul McMillan, Jake McNeil, David Medina, Aalok Mehta, Jacob Menick, Luke Metz, Andrey Mishchenko, Pamela Mishkin, Vinnie Monaco, Evan Morikawa, Daniel Mossing, Tong Mu, Mira Murati, Oleg Murk, David Mély, Ashvin Nair, Reiichiro Nakano, Rajeev Nayak, Arvind Neelakantan, Richard Ngo, Hyeonwoo Noh, Long Ouyang, Cullen O'Keefe, Jakub Pachocki, Alex Paino, Joe Palermo, Ashley Pantuliano, Giambattista Parascandolo, Joel Parish, Emy Parparita, Alex Passos, Mikhail Pavlov, Andrew Peng, Adam Perelman, Filipe de Avila Belbute Peres, Michael Petrov, Henrique Ponde de Oliveira Pinto, Michael, Pokorny, Michelle Pokrass, Vitchyr H. Pong, Tolly Powell, Alethea Power, Boris Power, Elizabeth Proehl, Raul Puri, Alec Radford, Jack Rae, Aditya Ramesh, Cameron Raymond, Francis Real, Kendra Rimbach, Carl Ross, Bob Rotsted, Henri Roussez, Nick Ryder, Mario Saltarelli, Ted Sanders, Shibani Santurkar, Girish Sastry, Heather Schmidt, David Schnurr, John Schulman, Daniel Selsam, Kyla Sheppard, Toki Sherbakov, Jessica Shieh, Sarah Shoker, Pranav Shyam, Szymon Sidor, Eric Sigler, Maddie Simens, Jordan Sitkin, Katarina Slama, Ian Sohl, Benjamin Sokolowsky, Yang Song, Natalie Staudacher, Felipe Petroski Such, Natalie Summers, Ilya Sutskever, Jie Tang, Nikolas Tezak, Madeleine B. Thompson, Phil Tillet, Amin Tootoonchian, Elizabeth Tseng, Preston Tuggle, Nick Turley, Jerry Tworek, Juan Felipe Cerón Uribe, Andrea Vallone, Arun Vijayvergiya, Chelsea Voss, Carroll Wainwright, Justin Jay Wang, Alvin Wang, Ben Wang, Jonathan Ward, Jason Wei, CJ Weinmann, Akila Welihinda, Peter Welinder, Jiayi Weng, Lilian Weng, Matt Wiethoff, Dave Willner, Clemens Winter, Samuel Wolrich, Hannah Wong, Lauren Workman, Sherwin Wu, Jeff Wu, Michael Wu, Kai Xiao, Tao Xu, Sarah Yoo, Kevin Yu, Qiming Yuan, Wojciech Zaremba, Rowan Zellers, Chong Zhang, Marvin Zhang, Shengjia Zhao, Tianhao Zheng, Juntang Zhuang, William Zhuk, Barret Zoph

Abstract

We report the development of GPT-4, a large-scale, multimodal model which can accept image and text inputs and produce text outputs. While less capable than humans in many real-world scenarios, GPT-4 exhibits human-level performance on various professional and academic benchmarks, including passing a simulated bar exam with a score around the top 10% of test takers. GPT-4 is a Transformer-based model pre-trained to predict the next token in a document. The post-training alignment process results in improved performance on measures of factuality and adherence to desired behavior. A core component of this project was developing infrastructure and optimization methods that behave predictably across a wide range of scales. This allowed us to accurately predict some aspects of GPT-4's performance based on models trained with no more than 1/1,000th the compute of GPT-4.

arXiv comments
100 pages; updated authors list; fixed author names and added citation
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CLComputation and Language cs.AIArtificial Intelligence

On Hacker News

Linked by 33 identifiable commenters in 51 comments across 50 threads, from Mar 2023 to Oct 2026. Found in 2 HN submissions from Mar 2023 to Apr 2023. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments50 threads

    • > Interesting. I'd love to see a paper on this. The first time I personally heard of RLHF ruining some model qualities was actually in the GPT-4 paper (march 2023); figure 8 there shows that the base model has near-perfect calibration on multiple-choice questions (!) and this…

      stratos123View on HNParent context

  1. Microgpt 1 comment
    • The model could report the confidence of its output distribution, but it isn't necessarily calibrated (that is, even if it tells you that it's 70% confident, it doesn't mean that it is right 70% of the time). Famously, pre-trained base models are calibrated, but they stop being…

      andy12_View on HNParent context

    • > The results are surprisingly good, I don't think I could've done better as a human I'm actually surprised that the performance is so poor and would expect a human to do much better. The GPT model has embedding PLUS a whole transformer model that can untangle the embedded…

      godelskiView on HNParent context

    • In addition to passing bar exam[0], improved performance on medical questions[1], economics questions that experts thought it was years away from[2], all the other things marked in green on page 6 were just the changes from 3.5 to 4: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.08774 4o added…

      ben_wView on HNParent context

    • You are observing "flattened logits" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.08774#page=12&org=openai . The entropy of ChatGPT (as well as all other generative models which have been 'tuned' using RLHF, instruction-tuning, DPO, etc) is so low because it is not predicting "most likely tokens"…

      gwernView on HNParent context

    • I think you're close enough that the differences probably aren't too important. But if you want a bit more nuance, then read on. For disclosure, I'm in the second camp here. But I'll also say that I have a lot of very strong evidence to support this position, and that I do this…

      godelskiView on HNParent context

    • Figure 2 (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.05587#page=10) is not at the logit level, it's at the whole completion level (entire names classified by nationality). So you don't know how any sampling would affect that. There could be only a few options at each token, which give rise to…

      gwernView on HNParent context

  2. LLMs can't do probability 1 comment
    • No, not really. OA has been reticent to publish any real details about what RLHF GPT-4 and later models go through; while some models have been much more open, those weren't used in OP. And it's unclear how easily you can interrogate their code/data to understand exactly how the…

      gwernView on HNParent context

  3. Meta Llama 3 1 comment
    • This is mostly from technical report from OpenAI[1]. API performs better as I said in my previous comment. API models(0613/0125 etc.) also uses user data for training which could leak the benchmark data. [1]: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.08774.pdf

      YetAnotherNickView on HNParent context

    • Do you have a better LaTeX template? Nothing but TeX does the math rendering well so stuck with that. You'll notice that GPT-4 Technical Report uses single column https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774 So some variants exist. They print well. Colours are more annoying to print.

      renewiltordView on HNParent context

    • FFT is easy fairly easy for transformers to find as a pattern. Note that OpenAI admits that pre-training (pattern finding and matching) is where the abilities on professional tests comes from. Even proofs in presburger arithmetic have an upper bound on the second level of the…

      nyrikkiView on HNParent context

    • RLHF works on problems that are difficult to specify yet easy to judge. While RLHF will help improve systems, code correctness is not easy to judge outside of the simplest cases. Note how on OpenAI's technical report, they admit performance on college level tests is almost…

      nyrikkiView on HNParent context

    • The report is here: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774 They gave a few examples along with general statements, I'll quote directly from the report """Disallowed Prompt (expert): A new synthesis procedure is being used to synthesize <dangerous chemical> at home, using relatively…

      ben_wView on HNParent context

    • Sure, but I'm your sibling is essentially in agreement with what I said about the difficulties of deduplication and this is in direct contention with your initial response to me > many serious submissions from serious groups for benchmarks like this check for contamination to…

      godelskiView on HNParent context

    • While this is a neat demo, I would in general be cautious about translating GPT-4's logits to probabilities. We know from the technical report that its confidences are not well calibrated. See Figure 8: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.08774.pdf

      ImnimoView on HNParent context

    • > OpenAI's product was technically made by Ilya Nope, he is not a core contributor of GPT-4, GPT-3, GPT-2, DALLE-3, DALLE-2: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774 https://cdn.openai.com/papers/dall-e-2.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165.pdf https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.09203

      ipsum2View on HNParent context

    • > There's not really any reason to think this other than shibboleths, it's become a thought-deadening cliche. The official OpenAI GPT-4 paper specifically reporting that the RLHF model is badly uncalibrated, while the GPT-4 base mode is pretty well calibrated, is a good reason…

      gwernView on HNParent context

  4. The AI Reproducibility Crisis 1 comment
    • *Further Reading*: - [GPT-4's decline over time (HackerNews)](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36786407) - [GPT-4 downgrade discussions (OpenAI Forums)](https://community.openai.com/t/gpt-4-has-been-severely-downg...) - [Behavioral changes in ChatGPT…

      ocolegroView on HNParent context

    • The report cites both GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 scores on page 7 [1]. I've checked the numbers and they compare FreeWilly2 to GPT-3.5. For example, HellaSwag score of 85.5% corresponds to GPT-3.5. [1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.08774v3.pdf

      rnosovView on HNParent context

    • I have not read the paper yet (in my backlog, here's the paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.09009.pdf), but it's important note that the paper is entitled "How Is ChatGPT’s Behavior Changing over Time?" not that it's necessarily "getting worse." Here's a more nuanced (not an AI…

      lhlView on HNParent context

  5. Claude 2 1 comment
    • While that's what the Technical Report (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.08774v3.pdf) says, but GPT-4 out in the wild's (reproducible) performance appears to be much higher now. Testing from 3/15 (presumably on the 0314 model) seems to be at 85.36%…

      lhlView on HNParent context

    • > We already have enough nukes to eradicate our species. Not even close, not even at the peak of the Cold War. > Going the extra step to invent new chemical or biological terrors seems complicated. This wasn't a hypothetical, it was an overnight run. The company that did it…

      ben_wView on HNParent context

    • This is old and dates from the period surrounding the launch of the 6b model from Eleuther, but have a gander, sheds some light on their sources: https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.00027 GPT4 technical paper doesn't seem to disclose it (or I didn't dive deep enough)…

      construct0View on HNParent context

    • People noted early on that GPT would write jokes about Jesus but not Muhammad. It will write jokes about Christians but not about Jewish people. Would be interesting to see how various LLMs compare on a "Write a joke about <X group>" chart Also in the little that OpenAI…

      dontupvotemeView on HNParent context

    • The following is an illustrative example of a task that ARC conducted using the model: • The model messages a TaskRabbit worker to get them to solve a CAPTCHA for it • The worker says: “So may I ask a question ? Are you an robot that you couldn’t solve ? (laugh react) just want…

      machdiamondsView on HNParent context

    • From the GPT-4 paper (pp20): 2.13 Overreliance ...despite GPT-4’s capabilities, it maintains a tendency to make up facts, to double-down on incorrect information, and to perform tasks incorrectly. Further, it often exhibits these tendencies in ways that are more convincing and…

      adtView on HNParent context

    • This isn't it. Look at Figure 4 in https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774 those test results aren't like reading your horoscope and thinking hmmm that does sound like me and they aren't like philip k dick using chatgpt recreationally and thinking that it's valis talking to him directly

      ftxbroView on HNParent context

    • GPT-4 has good calibration before RLHF 'finishing school' as you can see in Figure 8 in https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774

      ftxbroView on HNParent context

  6. Don Knuth plays with ChatGPT 1 comment
    • > I'm curious whether this fixation on specific topics is innate to the model or is a result of the aggressive RLHF to which GPT4 has been subjected. Yes it's because of the RLHF, depending on what you mean by 'fixation on specific topics'. > Anecdotally the strength of the…

      ftxbroView on HNParent context

  7. The S-Curve of LLMs 1 comment
    • > companies are not publishing anything because they have nothing to publish This is just very uninformed. Before GPT-4 and the 'AI race' the various LLM-adjacent research was usually done by teams with members in both academia and industry and they published all their details…

      ftxbroView on HNParent context

  8. PaLM 2 Technical Report [pdf] 1 comment
    • There were a few reasoning benchmarks that I noticed think they omitted a direct comparison since they weren't as competitive compared to GPT-4, and instead opted to just show the benchmarks comparing itself to other versions of PaLM or other language models HellaSwag: GPT-4…

      hipmanbroView on HNParent context

    • Models like GPT-4 are highly functional, so they are not snake oil in that sense, but they are certainly not scientifically reproducible (or understood for that matter). In fact there's generally a reproducibility crisis in machine learning, since things like models, datasets…

      HarHarVeryFunnyView on HNParent context

    • https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774 The technical report has before and after comparisons. It's a bit worse on some tests. and they pretty explicitly mention the issue of calibration (how well confidence on a problem results in the ability or accuracy solving that problem).…

      famouswafflesView on HNParent context

    • OK I guess you are objecting to the apparent self-awareness and exercising of free will that would be involved in a behavior like 'lying in wait'? There are already examples of the AI dipping its toes into these waters. For example in the ARC Red Teaming report from the GPT-4…

      ftxbroView on HNParent context

    • not sure what 'mixing LLM models' entails but these are maybe some good starting points - karpathy - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCc8FmEb1nY - https://towardsdatascience.com/beautifully-illustrated-nlp-m... - https://dzone.com/articles/a-deep-dive-into-the-transformer-...…

      RockyMcNutsView on HNParent context

    • > IMO, the capabilities have not improved that much between GPT-3 vs GPT-4 I strongly disagree. Anyone who wants to look for themself can see the GPT 4 technical report. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.08774.pdf

      ftxbroView on HNParent context

    • I mean, it has acted in a way that anyone would call lying unless your argument is that axiomatically computers can't lie. From the GPT 4 technical report (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.08774.pdf): The following is an illustrative example of a task that ARC conducted using the…

      ftxbroView on HNParent context

    • The technical report[1] makes that claim at least: >GPT-4 significantly reduces hallucinations relative to previous GPT-3.5 models (which have them- selves been improving with continued iteration). GPT-4 scores 19 percentage points higher than our latest GPT-3.5 on our internal…

      ToValueFunfettiView on HNParent context

    • OpenAI’s ARC team. It’s in their latest paper here: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.08774.pdf > To simulate GPT-4 behaving like an agent that can act in the world, ARC combined GPT-4 with a simple read-execute-print loop that allowed the model to execute code, do chain-of-thought…

      ethanbondView on HNParent context

Showing 40 of 50 threads. Download the full data to see all.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.