arXiv:2410.06195cs.CL
EgoSocialArena: Benchmarking the Social Intelligence of Large Language Models from a First-person Perspective
Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.
Abstract
Social intelligence is built upon three foundational pillars: cognitive intelligence, situational intelligence, and behavioral intelligence. As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into our social lives, understanding, evaluating, and developing their social intelligence are becoming increasingly important. While multiple existing works have investigated the social intelligence of LLMs, (1) most focus on a specific aspect, and the social intelligence of LLMs has yet to be systematically organized and studied; (2) position LLMs as passive observers from a third-person perspective, such as in Theory of Mind (ToM) tests. Compared to the third-person perspective, ego-centric first-person perspective evaluation can align well with actual LLM-based Agent use scenarios. (3) a lack of comprehensive evaluation of behavioral intelligence, with specific emphasis on incorporating critical human-machine interaction scenarios. In light of this, we present EgoSocialArena, a novel framework grounded in the three pillars of social intelligence: cognitive, situational, and behavioral intelligence, aimed to systematically evaluate the social intelligence of LLMs from a first-person perspective. With EgoSocialArena, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of eight prominent foundation models, even the most advanced LLMs like O1-preview lag behind human performance.
I can't suggest a new test no, it is a hard problem and identifying problems is usually easier than solving them. I'm just trying to say that strong claims require strong evidence, and a claim that LLM's can have theory of mind and thus "understand that other people have…
zipy124View on HNParent context