<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>EgoSocialArena: Benchmarking the Social Intelligence of Large Language Models from a First-person Perspective · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.06195/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.06195/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>EgoSocialArena: Benchmarking the Social Intelligence of Large Language Models from a First-person Perspective — mentioned by zipy124</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43100500</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2410.06195:43100500</guid><pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2025 10:09:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I can&amp;#x27;t suggest a new test no, it is a hard problem and identifying problems is usually easier than solving them. I&amp;#x27;m just trying to say that strong claims require strong evidence, and a claim that LLM&amp;#x27;s can have theory of mind and thus &amp;quot;understand that other people have different beliefs, desires, and intentions than you do&amp;quot; is a very strong claim. It&amp;#x27;s like giving students the math problem of 1+1=2 and loads of examples of it solved in front of them, and then testing them on you have 1 apple, and I give you another apple, how many do you have, and then when they are correct saying that they…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2410.06195/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
