arXiv:2405.19616cs.AI
Easy Problems That LLMs Get Wrong
Abstract
We introduce a comprehensive Linguistic Benchmark designed to evaluate the limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs) in domains such as logical reasoning, spatial intelligence, and linguistic understanding, among others. Through a series of straightforward questions, it uncovers the significant limitations of well-regarded models to perform tasks that humans manage with ease. It also highlights the potential of prompt engineering to mitigate some errors and underscores the necessity for better training methodologies. Our findings stress the importance of grounding LLMs with human reasoning and common sense, emphasising the need for human-in-the-loop for enterprise applications. We hope this work paves the way for future research to enhance the usefulness and reliability of new models.
We need results from these harder/different benchmarks which give pretty bad scores to current top LLMs. https://www.wolfram.com/llm-benchmarking-project/ https://help.kagi.com/kagi/ai/llm-benchmark.html Edit : There are few other benchmarks that give pretty low scores (<20%) to…
smusamashahView on HNParent context
The sample answers for the horse race question are crazy. [0] Pretty much all the LLM really want to split 6 horses into two groups of three. Only LLAMA 3 makes the justification that only 2 horses can be raced at a time, but then gets its modified question wrong by racing three…
thethirdoneView on HNParent context