<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Easy Problems That LLMs Get Wrong · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2405.19616/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2405.19616/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Easy Problems That LLMs Get Wrong — mentioned by thethirdone</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41462671</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2405.19616:41462671</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 03:37:15 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The sample answers for the horse race question are crazy. [0] Pretty much all the LLM really want to split 6 horses into two groups of three. Only LLAMA 3 makes the justification that only 2 horses can be raced at a time, but then gets its modified question wrong by racing three horses. I personally would consider an answer that presumes some restriction to how the horses can be raced to be valid if it answers the restricted version correctly. [0]: https://arxiv.org/html/2405.19616v2#S9.SS2.SSS1&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2405.19616/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>Easy Problems That LLMs Get Wrong — mentioned by smusamashah</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41460739</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2405.19616:41460739</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 22:00:50 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;We need results from these harder/different benchmarks which give pretty bad scores to current top LLMs. https://www.wolfram.com/llm-benchmarking-project/ https://help.kagi.com/kagi/ai/llm-benchmark.html Edit : There are few other benchmarks that give pretty low scores (&amp;lt;20%) to top LLMs. Can&amp;#x27;t find them atm. There was a benchmark with common sense easy looking questions. Edit: found two more papers https://arxiv.org/html/2405.19616 https://arxiv.org/html/2406.02061v1 Edit: How about Wordle? https://www.strangeloopcanon.com/p/what-can-llms-never-do https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40179232&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2405.19616/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>Easy Problems That LLMs Get Wrong — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40533295</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2405.19616:40533295</guid><pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2024 10:28:35 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Easy Problems That LLMs Get Wrong&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;5 points; 2 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2405.19616/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item></channel></rss>
