arXiv:2208.02199physics.chem-ph
Is there evidence for exponential quantum advantage in quantum chemistry?
Abstract
The idea to use quantum mechanical devices to simulate other quantum systems is commonly ascribed to Feynman. Since the original suggestion, concrete proposals have appeared for simulating molecular and materials chemistry through quantum computation, as a potential ``killer application''. Indications of potential exponential quantum advantage in artificial tasks have increased interest in this application, thus, it is critical to understand the basis for potential exponential quantum advantage in quantum chemistry. Here we gather the evidence for this case in the most common task in quantum chemistry, namely, ground-state energy estimation. We conclude that evidence for such an exponential advantage across chemical space has yet to be found. While quantum computers may still prove useful for quantum chemistry, it may be prudent to assume exponential speedups are not generically available for this problem.
One point of interest was the paper on quantum computing applied to quantum chemistry[1]. In that paper, they did not find generic exponential speedup for a list of chemistry problems with current quantum algorithms. There are 3 problems with this: a speedup does not need to be…
throw149102View on HNParent context
The key word being 'if' - cited research from the FT article that disclaims this: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2208.02199.pdf I have no expertise in QC/chemistry so I can't make a judgement other than to say it doesn't seem universally agreed that QC will be a silver bullet here.
sweezyjeezyView on HNParent context