<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Is there evidence for exponential quantum advantage in quantum chemistry? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2208.02199/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2208.02199/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Is there evidence for exponential quantum advantage in quantum chemistry? — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45306921</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2208.02199:45306921</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 21:34:03 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there evidence for exponential quantum advantage in quantum chemistry?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2208.02199/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.chem-ph</category></item><item><title>Is there evidence for exponential quantum advantage in quantum chemistry? — mentioned by sweezyjeezy</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32725589</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2208.02199:32725589</guid><pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2022 15:43:09 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The key word being &amp;#x27;if&amp;#x27; - cited research from the FT article that disclaims this: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2208.02199.pdf I have no expertise in QC/chemistry so I can&amp;#x27;t make a judgement other than to say it doesn&amp;#x27;t seem universally agreed that QC will be a silver bullet here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2208.02199/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.chem-ph</category></item><item><title>Is there evidence for exponential quantum advantage in quantum chemistry? — mentioned by throw149102</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32724738</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2208.02199:32724738</guid><pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2022 14:33:14 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;One point of interest was the paper on quantum computing applied to quantum chemistry[1]. In that paper, they did not find generic exponential speedup for a list of chemistry problems with current quantum algorithms. There are 3 problems with this: a speedup does not need to be exponential in order to be incredibly valuable; a speedup does not need to be extremely generic, just enough to cover real-world use cases; and quantum algorithms are still in their infancy, and it&amp;#x27;s unclear how much more we might discover in the next 10-20 years. Furthermore, the paper itself links to a github…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2208.02199/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.chem-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
