HackerPapers

arXiv:2110.03137quant-ph

Application-Oriented Performance Benchmarks for Quantum Computing

Thomas Lubinski, Sonika Johri, Paul Varosy, Jeremiah Coleman, Luning Zhao, Jason Necaise, Charles H. Baldwin, Karl Mayer, Timothy Proctor

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

In this work we introduce an open source suite of quantum application-oriented performance benchmarks that is designed to measure the effectiveness of quantum computing hardware at executing quantum applications. These benchmarks probe a quantum computer's performance on various algorithms and small applications as the problem size is varied, by mapping out the fidelity of the results as a function of circuit width and depth using the framework of volumetric benchmarking. In addition to estimating the fidelity of results generated by quantum execution, the suite is designed to benchmark certain aspects of the execution pipeline in order to provide end-users with a practical measure of both the quality of and the time to solution. Our methodology is constructed to anticipate advances in quantum computing hardware that are likely to emerge in the next five years. This benchmarking suite is designed to be readily accessible to a broad audience of users and provides benchmarks that correspond to many well-known quantum computing algorithms.

arXiv comments
33 pages, 36 figures; Added to Section VI about Impact of Compiler Optimization Techniques; Updated 20230105 for clarity after review feedback
Journal reference
IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering 2021
DOI
doi:10.1109/TQE.2023.3253761
Subjects
quant-phQuantum Physics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 3 comments across 3 threads, from Nov 2021 to Jan 2023. Found in 1 HN submission from Feb 2022 to Feb 2022. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments3 threads

  1. IBM Quantum System Two 1 comment
    • Although I'm not up to date on the most recent industry developments, I'd say to be less concerned about the number of qubits, and more concerned about the gate fidelity and qubit coherence. Certainly, you want a quantum computer that you can actually use [1]! It's also…

      kvathupoView on HNParent context

  2. The quantum computing bubble 1 comment
    • Frankly, the article reads as if the author has an axe to grind. On utility, there's more than just Shor's: unstructured search [1], finance ([2], [3]). Even if quantum computers ultimately prove unfruitful commercially, that doesn't render it a useless endeavor. Like String…

      kvathupoView on HNParent context

    • With the caveat that the paper is from a competitor that I like, this benchmark paper [1] makes me inclined to disregard this result. See figure 1. __EDIT:__ whoops wrong figure, just read section iv or see the first figure here [2] [1] - https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.03137 [2]…

      kvathupoView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.