HackerPapers

arXiv:1608.00263quant-ph

Characterizing Quantum Supremacy in Near-Term Devices

Sergio Boixo, Sergei V. Isakov, Vadim N. Smelyanskiy, Ryan Babbush, Nan Ding, Zhang Jiang, Michael J. Bremner, John M. Martinis, Hartmut Neven

Abstract

A critical question for the field of quantum computing in the near future is whether quantum devices without error correction can perform a well-defined computational task beyond the capabilities of state-of-the-art classical computers, achieving so-called quantum supremacy. We study the task of sampling from the output distributions of (pseudo-)random quantum circuits, a natural task for benchmarking quantum computers. Crucially, sampling this distribution classically requires a direct numerical simulation of the circuit, with computational cost exponential in the number of qubits. This requirement is typical of chaotic systems. We extend previous results in computational complexity to argue more formally that this sampling task must take exponential time in a classical computer. We study the convergence to the chaotic regime using extensive supercomputer simulations, modeling circuits with up to 42 qubits - the largest quantum circuits simulated to date for a computational task that approaches quantum supremacy. We argue that while chaotic states are extremely sensitive to errors, quantum supremacy can be achieved in the near-term with approximately fifty superconducting qubits. We introduce cross entropy as a useful benchmark of quantum circuits which approximates the circuit fidelity. We show that the cross entropy can be efficiently measured when circuit simulations are available. Beyond the classically tractable regime, the cross entropy can be extrapolated and compared with theoretical estimates of circuit fidelity to define a practical quantum supremacy test.

arXiv comments
Increased circuit depth, added one author, updated references. 23 pages, 15 figures
Journal reference
Nature Physics 14, 595-600 (2018)
DOI
doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0124-x
Subjects
quant-phQuantum Physics

On Hacker News

Linked by 7 identifiable commenters in 7 comments across 7 threads, from Jan 2017 to Sep 2019. Found in 1 HN submission from May 2018 to May 2018. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments7 threads

    • - Cross-entropy is used for roughly estimating the fidelity (see arXiv:1608.00263), which is independent of the problem they're solving. You're confusing it with the overall distribution of the readout states, which is the hard problem. - CZ is a perfect entangler. No, iSWAP and…

      tagrunView on HNParent context

    • I'm not an expert, but you are correct in that there is no error correction here, and error correction is still a long way off. Around 2016, realizing that running useful quantum algorithms was a long way away and there needed to be earlier roadmarks for quantum devices to…

      comnetxrView on HNParent context

    • The keyword to google for here is "quantum supremacy". There is for example this paper https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.00263

      adrianNView on HNParent context

    • I believe they talk about the computational task described in [1] (published in 2016). Note that this is somewhat contrived: it's a task defined specifically so that it is very difficult for classical computers and relatively easy for quantum computers. It is also defined in a…

      avzView on HNParent context

  1. Fake Physics 1 comment
    • > there are also no real signs that a quantum computer will beat a "classical" computer at anything any time soon John Martinis' group is planning to do that within the next two years [1][2]. Ten years might be realistic for solving useful problems faster and cheaper, but the…

      StrilancView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.