HackerPapers

arXiv:1811.00414cs.DS

Quantum principal component analysis only achieves an exponential speedup because of its state preparation assumptions

Ewin Tang

Abstract

A central roadblock to analyzing quantum algorithms on quantum states is the lack of a comparable input model for classical algorithms. Inspired by recent work of the author [E. Tang, STOC'19], we introduce such a model, where we assume we can efficiently perform $\ell^2$-norm samples of input data, a natural analogue to quantum algorithms that assume efficient state preparation of classical data. Though this model produces less practical algorithms than the (stronger) standard model of classical computation, it captures versions of many of the features and nuances of quantum linear algebra algorithms. With this model, we describe classical analogues to Lloyd, Mohseni, and Rebentrost's quantum algorithms for principal component analysis [Nat. Phys. 10, 631 (2014)] and nearest-centroid clustering [arXiv:1307.0411]. Since they are only polynomially slower, these algorithms suggest that the exponential speedups of their quantum counterparts are simply an artifact of state preparation assumptions.

arXiv comments
6 pages + 7 pages (supplemental material). Title used to be "Quantum-inspired classical algorithms for principal component analysis and supervised clustering"
Journal reference
Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 060503 (2021)
DOI
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.060503
Subjects
cs.DSData Structures and Algorithms cs.IRInformation Retrieval cs.LGMachine Learning quant-phQuantum Physics

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 2 comments across 2 threads, from Sep 2019 to Sep 2021. Found in 1 HN submission from Nov 2018 to Nov 2018. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • This might be coming up again because the paper was finally published, like in a journal after peer-review, one month ago [1]. The pre-print has been available since 2018 [2]. [1]: https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.12... [2]…

      StrilancView on HNParent context

    • I guess you're right, I remember seeing quantum algorithms that were assumed to be more efficient than any classical algorithm and then people devised equally efficient classical algorithms. E.g. work by Ewin Tang https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.00414

      outlaceView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.