HackerPapers

arXiv:1709.06678quant-ph

A blueprint for demonstrating quantum supremacy with superconducting qubits

C. Neill, P. Roushan, K. Kechedzhi, S. Boixo, S. V. Isakov, V. Smelyanskiy, R. Barends, B. Burkett, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, A. Fowler, B. Foxen, R. Graff, E. Jeffrey, J. Kelly, E. Lucero, A. Megrant, J. Mutus, M. Neeley, C. Quintana, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, T. C. White, H. Neven, J. M. Martinis

Abstract

Fundamental questions in chemistry and physics may never be answered due to the exponential complexity of the underlying quantum phenomena. A desire to overcome this challenge has sparked a new industry of quantum technologies with the promise that engineered quantum systems can address these hard problems. A key step towards demonstrating such a system will be performing a computation beyond the capabilities of any classical computer, achieving so-called quantum supremacy. Here, using 9 superconducting qubits, we demonstrate an immediate path towards quantum supremacy. By individually tuning the qubit parameters, we are able to generate thousands of unique Hamiltonian evolutions and probe the output probabilities. The measured probabilities obey a universal distribution, consistent with uniformly sampling the full Hilbert-space. As the number of qubits in the algorithm is varied, the system continues to explore the exponentially growing number of states. Combining these large datasets with techniques from machine learning allows us to construct a model which accurately predicts the measured probabilities. We demonstrate an application of these algorithms by systematically increasing the disorder and observing a transition from delocalized states to localized states. By extending these results to a system of 50 qubits, we hope to address scientific questions that are beyond the capabilities of any classical computer.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
doi:10.1126/science.aao4309
Subjects
quant-phQuantum Physics

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 2 comments across 2 threads, from Dec 2017 to May 2018. Found in 2 HN submissions from Sep 2017 to May 2018. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

  1. Simulating Physics 1 comment
    • I worked with the UCSB team on some of the thermalization calculations that didn't end up making it into the paper (I am at a different university). It's really cool to see how quickly phenomena we study in simulations came to the forefront of experiment. The actual paper can be…

      selimthegrimView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.