arXiv:1105.3689math.CO
The Binomial Coefficient for Negative Arguments
Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.
Abstract
The definition of the binomial coefficient in terms of gamma functions also allows non-integer arguments. For nonnegative integer arguments the gamma functions reduce to factorials, leading to the well-known Pascal triangle. Using a symmetry formula for the gamma function, this definition is extended to negative integer arguments, making the symmetry identity for binomial coefficients valid for all integer arguments. The agreement of this definition with some other identities and with the binomial theorem is investigated.
If Knuth is correct then I wonder how this paper https://arxiv.org/pdf/1105.3689.pdf cited by 32, proves Theorem 2.1 that gives Binomial[-1,-1] = Binomial[0,0] = 1. What exactly is the assumption on which they differ? Whatever value you set this coeficient to, it's clear that…
trompView on HNParent context