HackerPapers

arXiv:1105.3689math.CO

The Binomial Coefficient for Negative Arguments

M. J. Kronenburg

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

The definition of the binomial coefficient in terms of gamma functions also allows non-integer arguments. For nonnegative integer arguments the gamma functions reduce to factorials, leading to the well-known Pascal triangle. Using a symmetry formula for the gamma function, this definition is extended to negative integer arguments, making the symmetry identity for binomial coefficients valid for all integer arguments. The agreement of this definition with some other identities and with the binomial theorem is investigated.

arXiv comments
Corrected text on continuity
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
math.COCombinatorics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from May 2023 to May 2023.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

  1. Don Knuth plays with ChatGPT 1 comment
    • If Knuth is correct then I wonder how this paper https://arxiv.org/pdf/1105.3689.pdf cited by 32, proves Theorem 2.1 that gives Binomial[-1,-1] = Binomial[0,0] = 1. What exactly is the assumption on which they differ? Whatever value you set this coeficient to, it's clear that…

      trompView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.