HackerPapers

arXiv:hep-ph/0205340hep-ph

The fundamental constants and their variation: observational status and theoretical motivations

Jean-Philippe Uzan

Abstract

This article describes the various experimental bounds on the variation of the fundamental constants of nature. After a discussion on the role of fundamental constants, of their definition and link with metrology, the various constraints on the variation of the fine structure constant, the gravitational, weak and strong interactions couplings and the electron to proton mass ratio are reviewed. This review aims (1) to provide the basics of each measurement, (2) to show as clearly as possible why it constrains a given constant and (3) to point out the underlying hypotheses. Such an investigation is of importance to compare the different results, particularly in view of understanding the recent claims of the detections of a variation of the fine structure constant and of the electron to proton mass ratio in quasar absorption spectra. The theoretical models leading to the prediction of such variation are also reviewed, including Kaluza-Klein theories, string theories and other alternative theories and cosmological implications of these results are discussed. The links with the tests of general relativity are emphasized.

arXiv comments
56 pages, l7 figures, submitted to Rev. Mod. Phys
Journal reference
Rev.Mod.Phys.75:403,2003
DOI
doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.75.403
Subjects
hep-phHigh Energy Physics, Phenomenology astro-phAstrophysics gr-qcGeneral Relativity and Quantum Cosmology hep-thHigh Energy Physics, Theory

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 2 comments across 2 threads, from Mar 2025 to Sep 2026.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • Right. Added the wikipedia link to Dirac's LNH above. Also found this; The fundamental constants and their variation: observational status and theoretical motivations - https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0205340

      rramadassView on HNParent context

    • Thanks for the answer. I had forgotten about the No-communication theorem. This led me into another rabbit hole :-) of why c is 299,792,458 m/s and for example not 499,792,458 m/s or some other value, and the fundamental constants that bring this value. [1] Is there a current…

      belterView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.