The fundamental constants and their variation: observational status and theoretical motivations — mentioned by rramadass

Thu, 17 Sep 2026 11:28:23 GMT

Right. Added the wikipedia link to Dirac's LNH above. Also found this; The fundamental constants and their variation: observational status and theoretical motivations - https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0205340

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

The fundamental constants and their variation: observational status and theoretical motivations — mentioned by belter

Tue, 25 Mar 2025 20:10:45 GMT

Thanks for the answer. I had forgotten about the No-communication theorem. This led me into another rabbit hole :-) of why c is 299,792,458 m/s and for example not 499,792,458 m/s or some other value, and the fundamental constants that bring this value. [1] Is there a current theory that tries to justify those constants that bring the current value of c ? Are those values the ones that must be, for the current Universe to be feasible? [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0205340

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

The fundamental constants and their variation: observational status and theoretical motivations · HackerPapers discussions

The fundamental constants and their variation: observational status and theoretical motivations — mentioned by rramadass

The fundamental constants and their variation: observational status and theoretical motivations — mentioned by belter