HackerPapers

arXiv:cs/0010019cs.CR

The Random Oracle Methodology, Revisited

Ran Canetti, Oded Goldreich, Shai Halevi

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We take a critical look at the relationship between the security of cryptographic schemes in the Random Oracle Model, and the security of the schemes that result from implementing the random oracle by so called "cryptographic hash functions". The main result of this paper is a negative one: There exist signature and encryption schemes that are secure in the Random Oracle Model, but for which any implementation of the random oracle results in insecure schemes. In the process of devising the above schemes, we consider possible definitions for the notion of a "good implementation" of a random oracle, pointing out limitations and challenges.

arXiv comments
31 pages
Journal reference
In Proceedings of 30th Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, pages 209-218, May 1998, ACM
DOI
Subjects
cs.CRCryptography and Security

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Nov 2016 to Nov 2016.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

  1. The P=?NP Poll (2002) [pdf] 1 comment
    • Sure, but then again ex falso quodlibet... Just ask the academic cryptography community[1]. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0010019

      gone35View on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.