<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Random Oracle Methodology, Revisited · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cs_0010019/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cs_0010019/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Random Oracle Methodology, Revisited — mentioned by gone35</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12896464</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:cs_0010019:12896464</guid><pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:06:20 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Sure, but then again ex falso quodlibet... Just ask the academic cryptography community[1]. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0010019&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cs_0010019/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
