HackerPapers

arXiv:2606.04543cs.CY

Agentic AI and Pedagogical Best Practice: The Tension Between Automation and Learning

Steve Woollaston, Brendan Flanagan, Isanka Wijerathne, Hiroaki Ogata

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence in education is evolving from passive chatbots to proactive AI agents capable of initiation and goal-directed interactions. While offering opportunities for personalised learning, this shift risks undermining learner agency and cognitive effort. This paper reviews six pedagogical principles-prior knowledge activation, collaborative learning, problem-based learning, formative assessment, scaffolding, and metacognition-through the lens of agentic AI. We discuss the tension between automation and learning, proposing design recommendations that prioritise intentional friction, dynamic scaffolding, human-in-the-loop oversight, and considered AI utilisation to ensure AI supports rather than supplants human learning.

arXiv comments
Accepted for publication at AIED 2026 - Festival of Learning HAI-Agency Workshop on Orchestrating Human and AI Agency for Proactive and Reflective Learning
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CYComputers and Society

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Sep 2026 to Sep 2026.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • You're basically describing the established pedagogical field of Problem Based Learning, which is around as long as personal computing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem-based_learning In PBL the teacher adopts a constructivist approach - supporting, guiding, and monitoring…

      piltdownmanView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.