<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Agentic AI and Pedagogical Best Practice: The Tension Between Automation and Learning · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2606.04543/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2606.04543/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Agentic AI and Pedagogical Best Practice: The Tension Between Automation and Learning — mentioned by piltdownman</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49832604</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2606.04543:49832604</guid><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 16:00:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;You&amp;#x27;re basically describing the established pedagogical field of Problem Based Learning, which is around as long as personal computing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem-based_learning In PBL the teacher adopts a constructivist approach - supporting, guiding, and monitoring the learning process as opposed to delivering a defined curriculum via lectures or seminars. Agentic AI is arguably a better fit for this as it can scale infinitely to monitor student progress, offer timely feedback on design choices, and adjust difficulty dynamically based on how the student interacts with the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2606.04543/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CY</category></item></channel></rss>
