HackerPapers

arXiv:2512.19428cs.LG

Attention Is Not What You Need

Zhang Chong

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We revisit a basic question in sequence modeling: is explicit self-attention actually necessary for strong performance and reasoning? We argue that standard multi-head attention is best seen as a form of tensor lifting: hidden vectors are mapped into a high-dimensional space of pairwise interactions, and learning proceeds by constraining this lifted tensor through gradient descent. This mechanism is extremely expressive but mathematically opaque, because after many layers it becomes very hard to describe the model with a small family of explicit invariants. To explore an alternative, we propose an attention-free architecture based on Grassmann flows. Instead of forming an L by L attention matrix, our Causal Grassmann layer (i) linearly reduces token states, (ii) encodes local token pairs as two-dimensional subspaces on a Grassmann manifold via Plucker coordinates, and (iii) fuses these geometric features back into the hidden states through gated mixing. Information therefore propagates by controlled deformations of low-rank subspaces over multi-scale local windows, so the core computation lives on a finite-dimensional manifold rather than in an unstructured tensor space. On the Wikitext-2 language modeling benchmark, purely Grassmann-based models with 13 to 18 million parameters achieve validation perplexities within about 10 to 15 percent of size-matched Transformers. On the SNLI natural language inference task, a Grassmann-Plucker head on top of DistilBERT slightly outperforms a Transformer head, with best validation and test accuracies of 0.8550 and 0.8538 compared to 0.8545 and 0.8511. We analyze the complexity of Grassmann mixing, show linear scaling in sequence length for fixed rank, and argue that such manifold-based designs offer a more structured route toward geometric and invariant-based interpretations of neural reasoning.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.LGMachine Learning cs.AIArtificial Intelligence math.AGAlgebraic Geometry

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Feb 2026 to Feb 2026. Found in 5 HN submissions from Dec 2025 to Oct 2026. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • I think any kind of innovation here will have to take advantage of some structure inherent to the problem, like eliminating attention in favour of geometric structures like Grassman flows [1]. [1] Attention Is Not What You Need, https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.19428

      naaskingView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.