HackerPapers

arXiv:2302.13214cs.LG

Fast Attention Requires Bounded Entries

Josh Alman, Zhao Song

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

In modern machine learning, inner product attention computation is a fundamental task for training large language models such as Transformer, GPT-1, BERT, GPT-2, GPT-3 and ChatGPT. Formally, in this problem, one is given as input three matrices $Q, K, V \in [-B,B]^{n \times d}$, and the goal is to construct the matrix $\mathrm{Att}(Q,K,V) := \mathrm{diag}(A {\bf 1}_n)^{-1} A V \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times d}$, where $A = \exp(QK^\top/d)$ is the `attention matrix', and $\exp$ is applied entry-wise. Straightforward methods for this problem explicitly compute the $n \times n$ attention matrix $A$, and hence require time $Ω(n^2)$ even when $d = n^{o(1)}$ is small. In this paper, we investigate whether faster algorithms are possible by implicitly making use of the matrix $A$. We present two results, showing that there is a sharp transition at $B = Θ(\sqrt{\log n})$. $\bullet$ If $d = O(\log n)$ and $B = o(\sqrt{\log n})$, there is an $n^{1+o(1)}$ time algorithm to approximate $\mathrm{Att}(Q,K,V)$ up to $1/\mathrm{poly}(n)$ additive error. $\bullet$ If $d = O(\log n)$ and $B = Θ(\sqrt{\log n})$, assuming the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis from fine-grained complexity theory, it is impossible to approximate $\mathrm{Att}(Q,K,V)$ up to $1/\mathrm{poly}(n)$ additive error in truly subquadratic time $n^{2 - Ω(1)}$. This gives a theoretical explanation for the phenomenon observed in practice that attention computation is much more efficient when the input matrices have smaller entries.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.LGMachine Learning cs.CCComputational Complexity cs.DSData Structures and Algorithms stat.MLMachine Learning (Statistics)

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Feb 2026 to Feb 2026.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • There's a graveyard of 100s of papers with "approximate near linear time attention." They always hope the speed increase makes up for the lower quality, but it never does. The quadratic time seems inherent to the problem. Indeed, there are lower bounds showing that sub n^2…

      thomasahleView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.