HackerPapers

arXiv:2511.22625cs.CV

ReasonEdit: Towards Reasoning-Enhanced Image Editing Models

Fukun Yin, Shiyu Liu, Yucheng Han, Zhibo Wang, Peng Xing, Rui Wang, Wei Cheng, Yingming Wang, Aojie Li, Zixin Yin, Pengtao Chen, Xiangyu Zhang, Daxin Jiang, Xianfang Zeng, Gang Yu

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Recent advances in image editing models have shown remarkable progress. A common architectural design couples a multimodal large language model (MLLM) encoder with a diffusion decoder, as seen in systems such as Step1X-Edit and Qwen-Image-Edit, where the MLLM encodes both the reference image and the instruction but remains frozen during training. In this work, we demonstrate that unlocking the reasoning capabilities of MLLM can further push the boundaries of editing models. Specifically, we explore two reasoning mechanisms, thinking and reflection, which enhance instruction understanding and editing accuracy. Based on that, our proposed framework enables image editing in a thinking-editing-reflection loop: the thinking mechanism leverages the world knowledge of MLLM to interpret abstract instructions, while the reflection reviews editing results, automatically corrects unintended manipulations, and identifies the stopping round. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our reasoning approach achieves significant performance gains, with improvements of ImgEdit (+4.3%), GEdit (+4.7%), and Kris (+8.2%) when initializing our DiT from the Step1X-Edit (ReasonEdit-S), and also outperforms previous open-source methods on both GEdit and Kris when integrated with Qwen-Image-Edit (ReasonEdit-Q).

arXiv comments
code: https://github.com/stepfun-ai/Step1X-Edit
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CVComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Dec 2025 to Dec 2025.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • For arXiv papers, I prefer HTML format much more than PDF format. Compared to PDF format, HTML format is much more accessible because of browsers. Basically I can reuse my browser extensions to do anything I like without hassle, like translation, note taking, sending texts to…

      RandyOrionView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.