<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>ReasonEdit: Towards Reasoning-Enhanced Image Editing Models · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2511.22625/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2511.22625/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>ReasonEdit: Towards Reasoning-Enhanced Image Editing Models — mentioned by RandyOrion</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46178803</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2511.22625:46178803</guid><pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2025 03:05:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;For arXiv papers, I prefer HTML format much more than PDF format. Compared to PDF format, HTML format is much more accessible because of browsers. Basically I can reuse my browser extensions to do anything I like without hassle, like translation, note taking, sending texts to LLMs, and so on. For now, arXiv offers two HTML services: the default one in https://arxiv.org/html/xxxx.xxxxx , and the alternative one in https://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/html/xxxx.xxxxx , here &amp;#x27;x&amp;#x27; is a placeholder for a number or digit. The most glaring problem of the default HTML service is the coverage of papers.…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2511.22625/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
