HackerPapers

arXiv:2506.01926cs.AI

Large language models can learn and generalize steganographic chain-of-thought under process supervision

Joey Skaf, Luis Ibanez-Lissen, Robert McCarthy, Connor Watts, Vasil Georgiv, Hannes Whittingham, Lorena Gonzalez-Manzano, David Lindner, Cameron Tice, Edward James Young, Puria Radmard

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning not only enhances large language model performance but also provides critical insights into decision-making processes, marking it as a useful tool for monitoring model intent and planning. However, recent works have shown that banning the mention of a specific example of reward hacking causes obfuscation of the undesired reasoning traces but the persistence of the undesired behavior, threatening the reliability of CoT monitoring. We provide an extension to these results with regard to the ability of models to learn a specific type of obfuscated reasoning: steganography. First, we show that penalizing the use of specific strings within load-bearing reasoning traces causes models to substitute alternative strings. Crucially, this does not alter the underlying method by which the model performs the task, demonstrating that the model can learn to steganographically encode its reasoning.We further demonstrate that models can generalize an encoding scheme. When the penalized strings belong to an overarching class, the model learns not only to substitute strings seen in training, but also develops a general encoding scheme for all members of the class which it can apply to held-out testing strings.

arXiv comments
10 pages main text, 3 figures main text, 17 pages supplementary material, 1 figure supplementary material, accepted at NeurIPS 2025
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.AIArtificial Intelligence cs.CLComputation and Language cs.LGMachine Learning

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Aug 2026 to Aug 2026.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Ha! Good catch. The OODA comes from the initial pre-training steps where they harden the verification -- the verification and error-correction are baked in early on. Researchers showed that when language models are penalized for using specific terms during reasoning, they…

      dataviz1000View on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.