HackerPapers

arXiv:2505.11365cs.CY

Phare: A Safety Probe for Large Language Models

Pierre Le Jeune, Benoît Malézieux, Weixuan Xiao, Matteo Dora

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Ensuring the safety of large language models (LLMs) is critical for responsible deployment, yet existing evaluations often prioritize performance over identifying failure modes. We introduce Phare, a multilingual diagnostic framework to probe and evaluate LLM behavior across three critical dimensions: hallucination and reliability, social biases, and harmful content generation. Our evaluation of 17 state-of-the-art LLMs reveals patterns of systematic vulnerabilities across all safety dimensions, including sycophancy, prompt sensitivity, and stereotype reproduction. By highlighting these specific failure modes rather than simply ranking models, Phare provides researchers and practitioners with actionable insights to build more robust, aligned, and trustworthy language systems.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CYComputers and Society cs.AIArtificial Intelligence cs.CLComputation and Language cs.CRCryptography and Security

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from May 2025 to May 2025. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

  • Show HN: Phare: A Safety Probe for Large Language Models

    We've just published a benchmark and accompanying paper on arXiv that challenges conventional leaderboard-driven LLM evaluation. Phare focuses on factual reliability, prompt sensitivity, multilingual support, and how models handle false premises like issues that actually matter when you're building serious applications. Some insights: - Preference scores ≠ factual correctness. - Framing effects can cause models to miss obvious falsehoods. - Safety metrics like sycophancy and stereotype…

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.