<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Phare: A Safety Probe for Large Language Models · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2505.11365/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:27:26 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2505.11365/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Phare: A Safety Probe for Large Language Models — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44049913</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2505.11365:44049913</guid><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 10:08:05 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Show HN: Phare: A Safety Probe for Large Language Models&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We&amp;#x27;ve just published a benchmark and accompanying paper on arXiv that challenges conventional leaderboard-driven LLM evaluation. Phare focuses on factual reliability, prompt sensitivity, multilingual support, and how models handle false premises like issues that actually matter when you&amp;#x27;re building serious applications. Some insights: - Preference scores ≠ factual correctness. - Framing effects can cause models to miss obvious falsehoods. - Safety metrics like sycophancy and stereotype reproduction show surprising results across popular models. Would love feedback from the community.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2505.11365/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CY</category></item></channel></rss>
