HackerPapers

arXiv:2503.08733gr-qc

Are dark matter and dark energy omnipresent?

Richard Lieu

Abstract

A set of temporal singularities (transients) in the mass-energy density and pressure, bearing a specific mathematical structure which represents a new solution to the continuity equation (\ie~conservation of mass-energy) and satisfying the strong energy condition, is proposed to account for the expansion history of a homogeneous Universe, and the formation and binding of large scale structures as a continuum approximation of their cumulative effects. These singularities are unobservable because they occur rarely in time and are unresolvably fast, and that could be the reason why dark matter and dark energy have not been found. Implication on inflationary cosmology is discussed. The origin of these temporal singularities is unknown, safe to say that the same is true of the moment of the Big Bang itself. This work complements a recent paper, where a topological defect in the form of a spatial, spherical shell of density singularity giving rise to a 1/r attractive force (to test particles of positive mass) but zero integrated mass over a large volume of space, was proposed to solve the dark matter problem in bound structures but not cosmic expansion. The idea also involved a negative density, which is not present in the current model.

arXiv comments
8 pages, 34 equations. CQG in press
Journal reference
DOI
doi:10.1088/1361-6382/adbed1
Subjects
gr-qcGeneral Relativity and Quantum Cosmology astro-ph.COCosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

On Hacker News

Linked by 3 identifiable commenters in 3 comments across 1 thread, from Apr 2025 to Apr 2025.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Paper here: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.08733 TL;DR - replace one big singularity with multiple singularities. As in last sentence there is "The only difference between this work and the standard model is that the temporal singularity occurred only once in the latter, but more…

      ColinHayhurstView on HNParent context

    • > I don't have access to the paper https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.08733 > it seems to make zero testable predictions and is therefore just mathematical fiction I'll have a look when I get the time, but the reference to his previous paper really doesn't bode well.

      T-AView on HNParent context

    • Here: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.08733 Only managed a first read, but it seems there's no explanation for the CMB. Let alone any explanation for the CMB power spectrum peaks... ...therefore I won't bother further ;)

      DrNosferatuView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.