HackerPapers

arXiv:2502.02614astro-ph.IM

Earth Detecting Earth: At what distance could Earth's constellation of technosignatures be detected with present-day technology?

Sofia Z. Sheikh, Macy J. Huston, Pinchen Fan, Jason T. Wright, Thomas Beatty, Connor Martini, Ravi Kopparapu, Adam Frank

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

The field of the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) searches for ``technosignatures'' that could provide the first detection of life beyond Earth through the technology that an extraterrestrial intelligence (ETI) may have created. Any given SETI survey, if no technosignatures are detected, should set upper limits based on the kinds of technosignatures it should have been able to detect; the sensitivity of many SETI searches requires that their target sources (e.g., Dyson spheres or Kardashev II/III level radio transmitters) emit with power far exceeding the kinds of technology humans have developed. In this paper, we instead turn our gaze Earthward, minimizing the axis of extrapolation by only considering transmission and detection methods commensurate with an Earth-2024 level. We evaluate the maximum distance of detectability for various present-day Earth technosignatures -- radio transmissions, atmospheric technosignatures, optical and infrared signatures, and objects in space or on planetary surfaces -- using only present-day Earth instruments, providing one of the first fully cross-wavelength comparisons of the growing toolbox of SETI techniques. In this framework, we find that Earth's space-detectable signatures span 13 orders of magnitude in detectability, with intermittent, celestially-targeted radio transmission (i.e., planetary radar) beating out its nearest non-radio competitor by a factor of $10^3$ in detection distance. This work highlights the growing range of ways that exoplanet technosignatures may be expressed, the growing complexity and visibility of the human impact upon our planet, and the continued importance of the radio frequencies in SETI.

arXiv comments
18 pages, 1 figure, 2 tables, published in AJ
Journal reference
AJ 169 118 (2025)
DOI
doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ada3c7
Subjects
astro-ph.IMInstrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics astro-ph.EPEarth and Planetary Astrophysics physics.pop-phPopular Physics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Apr 2026 to Apr 2026.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • > It’s a logical extrapolation if you think life is a natural phenomenon. No, it really isn't. Taking life on Earth as an example, almost all of our technological signatures are effectively undetectable as little as 5 light years away. See e.g. the paper "Earth Detecting Earth"…

      antonvsView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.