<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Earth Detecting Earth: At what distance could Earth's constellation of technosignatures be detected with present-day technology? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2502.02614/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2502.02614/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Earth Detecting Earth: At what distance could Earth's constellation of technosignatures be detected with present-day technology? — mentioned by antonvs</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743905</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2502.02614:47743905</guid><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 20:08:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; It’s a logical extrapolation if you think life is a natural phenomenon. No, it really isn&amp;#x27;t. Taking life on Earth as an example, almost all of our technological signatures are effectively undetectable as little as 5 light years away. See e.g. the paper &amp;quot;Earth Detecting Earth&amp;quot; (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.02614). The maximum detectable distance for unintentional signal leakage is 4 light years - about the distance to Proxima Centauri, the nearest star. So if we&amp;#x27;re looking for that kind of signal, we have a population of exactly one star system that we might be able to detect something from…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2502.02614/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.IM</category></item></channel></rss>
