arXiv:2501.02517cs.AR
STRAW: A Stress-Aware WL-Based Read Reclaim Technique for High-Density NAND Flash-Based SSDs
Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.
Abstract
Although read disturbance has emerged as a major reliability concern, managing read disturbance in modern NAND flash memory has not been thoroughly investigated yet. From a device characterization study using real modern NAND flash memory, we observe that reading a page incurs heterogeneous reliability impacts on each WL, which makes the existing block-level read reclaim extremely inefficient. We propose a new WL-level read-reclaim technique, called STRAW, which keeps track of the accumulated read-disturbance effect on each WL and reclaims only heavily-disturbed WLs. By avoiding unnecessary read-reclaim operations, STRAW reduces read-reclaim-induced page writes by 83.6\% with negligible storage overhead.
Hm, I asked 5.6 Sol to calculate/research and it came up with way less optimistic lifespan than Gemini (that I've asked last year). It claims that each individual page read induces read disturb across whole block. And references https://arxiv.org/pdf/2501.02517 that tested…
petuView on HNParent context