HackerPapers

arXiv:2406.12027cs.CR

Adversarial Perturbations Cannot Reliably Protect Artists From Generative AI

Robert Hönig, Javier Rando, Nicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr

Abstract

Artists are increasingly concerned about advancements in image generation models that can closely replicate their unique artistic styles. In response, several protection tools against style mimicry have been developed that incorporate small adversarial perturbations into artworks published online. In this work, we evaluate the effectiveness of popular protections -- with millions of downloads -- and show they only provide a false sense of security. We find that low-effort and "off-the-shelf" techniques, such as image upscaling, are sufficient to create robust mimicry methods that significantly degrade existing protections. Through a user study, we demonstrate that all existing protections can be easily bypassed, leaving artists vulnerable to style mimicry. We caution that tools based on adversarial perturbations cannot reliably protect artists from the misuse of generative AI, and urge the development of alternative non-technological solutions.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CRCryptography and Security

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 2 comments across 2 threads, from Sep 2024 to Apr 2025. Found in 3 HN submissions from Jun 2024 to Jun 2024. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • Any new "defense" that claims to use adversarial perturbations to undermine GenAI training should have to explain why this paper does not apply to their technique: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.12027 The answer is, almost unfailingly, "this paper applies perfectly to our technique…

      ImnimoView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.