Adversarial Perturbations Cannot Reliably Protect Artists From Generative AI · HackerPapers discussions

Adversarial Perturbations Cannot Reliably Protect Artists From Generative AI — mentioned by Imnimo

Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:26:42 GMT

Any new "defense" that claims to use adversarial perturbations to undermine GenAI training should have to explain why this paper does not apply to their technique: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.12027 The answer is, almost unfailingly, "this paper applies perfectly to our technique because we are just rehashing the same ideas on new modalities". If you believe it's unethical for GenAI models to train on people's music, isn't is also unethical to trick those people into posting their music online with a fake "defense" that won't actually protect them?

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Adversarial Perturbations Cannot Reliably Protect Artists From Generative AI — mentioned by ronsor

Sun, 01 Sep 2024 17:02:03 GMT

These tools don't actually work[0], by the way. [0] https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.12027

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Adversarial Perturbations Cannot Reliably Protect Artists From Generative AI — HN submission

Sat, 22 Jun 2024 02:16:18 GMT

Adversarial Perturbations Cannot Reliably Protect Artists from Generative AI

4 points; 1 discussion reply on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Adversarial Perturbations Cannot Reliably Protect Artists From Generative AI — HN submission

Fri, 21 Jun 2024 10:32:02 GMT

Adversarial Perturbations Cannot Reliably Protect Artists from Generative AI

2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Adversarial Perturbations Cannot Reliably Protect Artists From Generative AI — HN submission

Wed, 19 Jun 2024 12:45:11 GMT

Adversarial Perturbations Cannot Reliably Protect Artists from Generative AI

5 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.