HackerPapers

arXiv:2402.08403cs.CL

LLMs and the Human Condition

Peter Wallis

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Theory based AI research has had a hard time recently and the aim here is to propose a model of what LLMs are actually doing when they impress us with their language skills. The model integrates three established theories of human decision-making from philosophy, sociology, and computer science. The paper starts with the collective understanding of reasoning from the early days of AI research - primarily because that model is how we humans think we think, and is the most accessible. It then describes what is commonly thought of as "reactive systems" which is the position taken by many philosophers and indeed many contemporary AI researchers. The third component to the proposed model is from sociology and based on the idea that human intelligence is a collective skill for which individuals are merely actors. The resulting model provides an alternate view of ``mind reading'' in human communication.

arXiv comments
Edits and rearranged to provide significantly tighter writing - no change to the content. Now targeting a one day workshop on multi agent systems and LLMs
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CLComputation and Language

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 3 comments across 3 threads, from Oct 2024 to Dec 2025. Found in 1 HN submission from Nov 2025 to Nov 2025. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments3 threads

  1. Do the thinking models think? 1 comment
    • The notion of "thinking" is not clear. I'll agree thinking with symbols is powerful and something (adult) humans and computers can do, but is is not the only way of making decisions. I'm going to suggest LLMs are not thinking this way, but that indeed "glorified auto complete"…

      PeteragainView on HNParent context

    • A beautifully written paper but I do feel it missed a major point. Vygotsky pointed out that "in ontogenesis one can discern a pre intellectual stage in the development of speech, and a pre linguistic stage in the development of thought"[Kozulin 1990 p153]. The pre intellectual…

      PeteragainView on HNParent context

    • I know a little about this area and there is certainly a movement (glacial) away from thinking that thinking uses symbols, distributed or not. The argument cannot be made in a popular science article and so such articles inevitably fall back on popular ideas of what thinking is.…

      PeteragainView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.