<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>LLMs and the Human Condition · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2402.08403/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2402.08403/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>LLMs and the Human Condition — mentioned by Peteragain</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46104889</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2402.08403:46104889</guid><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 08:28:58 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The notion of &amp;quot;thinking&amp;quot; is not clear. I&amp;#x27;ll agree thinking with symbols is powerful and something (adult) humans and computers can do, but is is not the only way of making decisions. I&amp;#x27;m going to suggest LLMs are not thinking this way, but that indeed &amp;quot;glorified auto complete&amp;quot; (c.f. Hinton) is far more useful than it seems. Https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.08403&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2402.08403/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>LLMs and the Human Condition — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46087001</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2402.08403:46087001</guid><pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2025 12:20:47 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;LLMs and the Human Condition&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 1 discussion reply on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2402.08403/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>LLMs and the Human Condition — mentioned by Peteragain</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46086790</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2402.08403:46086790</guid><pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2025 11:35:15 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A beautifully written paper but I do feel it missed a major point. Vygotsky pointed out that &amp;quot;in ontogenesis one can discern a pre intellectual stage in the development of speech, and a pre linguistic stage in the development of thought&amp;quot;[Kozulin 1990 p153]. The pre intellectual nature of language can be interpreted as &amp;quot;performative&amp;quot; language (eg &amp;quot;ouch!&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;I pronounce you man and wife&amp;quot;) but what does pre linguistic thinking look like? The contemporary answer I&amp;#x27;d propose is that it looks like situated action/ radical enactivism / behaviour-based robotics.(see for example Gallagher&amp;#x27;s 2020…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2402.08403/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>LLMs and the Human Condition — mentioned by Peteragain</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41893609</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2402.08403:41893609</guid><pubDate>Sun, 20 Oct 2024 07:27:11 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I know a little about this area and there is certainly a movement (glacial) away from thinking that thinking uses symbols, distributed or not. The argument cannot be made in a popular science article and so such articles inevitably fall back on popular ideas of what thinking is. The alternatives: the embodied nature of reasoning is one direction and many talk of an &amp;quot;enacivist&amp;quot; approach. There are certainly some kinds of thinking that require symbols, but a surprisingly large and diverse range of intelligent behaviour can be done by just wiring stuff up. Interestingly, a significant amount…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2402.08403/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
