arXiv:2401.05618cs.CL
The Benefits of a Concise Chain of Thought on Problem-Solving in Large Language Models
Abstract
In this paper, we introduce Concise Chain-of-Thought (CCoT) prompting. We compared standard CoT and CCoT prompts to see how conciseness impacts response length and correct-answer accuracy. We evaluated this using GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 with a multiple-choice question-and-answer (MCQA) benchmark. CCoT reduced average response length by 48.70% for both GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 while having a negligible impact on problem-solving performance. However, on math problems, GPT-3.5 with CCoT incurs a performance penalty of 27.69%. Overall, CCoT leads to an average per-token cost reduction of 22.67%. All code, data, and supplemental materials are available on GitHub at https://github.com/matthewrenze/jhu-concise-cot
Author here. I enjoyed the original idea behind the Caveman skill. I tried to log and do RLHF over my own mistakes and corrections in the LLM conversations and realized the skills were slowing everything down. Hence, I've this opinionated system prompt that aims to add a few…
AIrtemisView on HNParent context