HackerPapers

arXiv:2312.04258astro-ph.IM

Digital Discovery of interferometric Gravitational Wave Detectors

Mario Krenn, Yehonathan Drori, Rana X Adhikari

Abstract

Gravitational waves, detected a century after they were first theorized, are spacetime distortions caused by some of the most cataclysmic events in the universe, including black hole mergers and supernovae. The successful detection of these waves has been made possible by ingenious detectors designed by human experts. Beyond these successful designs, the vast space of experimental configurations remains largely unexplored, offering an exciting territory potentially rich in innovative and unconventional detection strategies. Here, we demonstrate the application of artificial intelligence (AI) to systematically explore this enormous space, revealing novel topologies for gravitational wave (GW) detectors that outperform current next-generation designs under realistic experimental constraints. Our results span a broad range of astrophysical targets, such as black hole and neutron star mergers, supernovae, and primordial GW sources. Moreover, we are able to conceptualize the initially unorthodox discovered designs, emphasizing the potential of using AI algorithms not only in discovering but also in understanding these novel topologies. We've assembled more than 50 superior solutions in a publicly available Gravitational Wave Detector Zoo which could lead to many new surprising techniques. At a bigger picture, our approach is not limited to gravitational wave detectors and can be extended to AI-driven design of experiments across diverse domains of fundamental physics.

arXiv comments
16 pages, 15 figures. Comments welcome!
Journal reference
Phys. Rev. X 15, 021012 (2025)
DOI
doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.15.021012
Subjects
astro-ph.IMInstrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics gr-qcGeneral Relativity and Quantum Cosmology physics.opticsOptics quant-phQuantum Physics

On Hacker News

Linked by 3 identifiable commenters in 3 comments across 1 thread, from Jul 2025 to Jul 2025.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • It's not that kind of AI. We know that these algorithms can produce novel solutions. See https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.04258, specifically "Urania".

      wizzwizz4View on HNParent context

    • I agree with your point, but I think it's worth noting that there's a real problem of language today both in popular and scientific communication. On the one hand, in popular understanding, there's the importance of clearly separating the era of "machine learning" as let's say…

      agentcoopsView on HNParent context

    • The thread is full of people debating what AI means and whether ML/optimization algorithms count as AI. Laypeople don't think of machine learning when they see AI, they think of chatbots. I would argue even for a techy magazine this is a bad term to use without spending two…

      christianqchungView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.