HackerPapers

arXiv:2309.09913math.PR

Sharp Thresholds for the Overlap Gap Property: Ising $p$-Spin Glass and Random $k$-SAT

Eren C. Kızıldağ

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

The Ising $p$-spin glass and random $k$-SAT are two canonical examples of disordered systems that play a central role in understanding the link between geometric features of optimization landscapes and computational tractability. Both models exhibit hard regimes where all known polynomial-time algorithms fail and possess the multi Overlap Gap Property ($m$-OGP), an intricate geometrical property that rigorously rules out a broad class of algorithms exhibiting input stability. We establish that, in both models, the symmetric $m$-OGP undergoes a sharp phase transition, and we pinpoint its exact threshold. For the Ising $p$-spin glass, our results hold for all sufficiently large $p$; for the random $k$-SAT, they apply to all $k$ growing mildly with the number of Boolean variables. Notably, our findings yield qualitative insights into the power of OGP-based arguments. A particular consequence for the Ising $p$-spin glass is that the strength of the $m$-OGP in establishing algorithmic hardness grows without bound as $m$ increases. These are the first sharp threshold results for the $m$-OGP. Our analysis hinges on a judicious application of the second moment method, enhanced by concentration. While a direct second moment calculation fails, we overcome this via a refined approach that leverages an argument of~\cite{frieze1990independence} and exploiting concentration properties of carefully constructed random variables.

arXiv comments
APPROX/RANDOM 2025
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
math.PRProbability cs.CCComputational Complexity cs.DSData Structures and Algorithms math-phMathematical Physics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Mar 2024 to Mar 2024.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • I don't know where, but there is another version of this class that includes "The Probabilistic Method"[1]. While not exactly the same thing, I can't imagine doing modern existential (vs constructive) proofs of topological solution space obstructions without that style of…

      soganessView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.