<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Sharp Thresholds for the Overlap Gap Property: Ising $p$-Spin Glass and Random $k$-SAT · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.09913/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.09913/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Sharp Thresholds for the Overlap Gap Property: Ising $p$-Spin Glass and Random $k$-SAT — mentioned by soganess</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39721211</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2309.09913:39721211</guid><pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 22:07:20 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#x27;t know where, but there is another version of this class that includes &amp;quot;The Probabilistic Method&amp;quot;[1]. While not exactly the same thing, I can&amp;#x27;t imagine doing modern existential (vs constructive) proofs of topological solution space obstructions without that style of thinking. [1]: https://math.bme.hu/~gabor/oktatas/SztoM/AlonSpencer.ProbMet... Bonus points for those interested -- I think this paper(sadly, not mine) has a concise collection / history of obstruction proofs in its background section (1.2/1.3 and since it is a paper all of them are cited!): https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.09913&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.09913/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.PR</category></item></channel></rss>
