HackerPapers

arXiv:2308.16898cs.LG

Transformers as Support Vector Machines

Davoud Ataee Tarzanagh, Yingcong Li, Christos Thrampoulidis, Samet Oymak

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Since its inception in "Attention Is All You Need", transformer architecture has led to revolutionary advancements in NLP. The attention layer within the transformer admits a sequence of input tokens $X$ and makes them interact through pairwise similarities computed as softmax$(XQK^\top X^\top)$, where $(K,Q)$ are the trainable key-query parameters. In this work, we establish a formal equivalence between the optimization geometry of self-attention and a hard-margin SVM problem that separates optimal input tokens from non-optimal tokens using linear constraints on the outer-products of token pairs. This formalism allows us to characterize the implicit bias of 1-layer transformers optimized with gradient descent: (1) Optimizing the attention layer with vanishing regularization, parameterized by $(K,Q)$, converges in direction to an SVM solution minimizing the nuclear norm of the combined parameter $W=KQ^\top$. Instead, directly parameterizing by $W$ minimizes a Frobenius norm objective. We characterize this convergence, highlighting that it can occur toward locally-optimal directions rather than global ones. (2) Complementing this, we prove the local/global directional convergence of gradient descent under suitable geometric conditions. Importantly, we show that over-parameterization catalyzes global convergence by ensuring the feasibility of the SVM problem and by guaranteeing a benign optimization landscape devoid of stationary points. (3) While our theory applies primarily to linear prediction heads, we propose a more general SVM equivalence that predicts the implicit bias with nonlinear heads. Our findings are applicable to arbitrary datasets and their validity is verified via experiments. We also introduce several open problems and research directions. We believe these findings inspire the interpretation of transformers as a hierarchy of SVMs that separates and selects optimal tokens.

arXiv comments
The proof of global convergence for gradient descent in the equal score setting has been fixed, referring to Theorem 2 of [TLZO23], and the experimental results have been extended
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.LGMachine Learning cs.AIArtificial Intelligence cs.CLComputation and Language math.OCOptimization and Control

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Sep 2023 to Sep 2023. Found in 2 HN submissions from Sep 2023 to Mar 2025. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Any comment on how the paper relates to "Every Model Learned by Gradient Descent Is Approximately a Kernel Machine" by Pedro Domingos? https://arxiv.org/pdf/2308.16898.pdf

      visargaView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.