HackerPapers

arXiv:2308.00824cs.LG

An Exact Kernel Equivalence for Finite Classification Models

Brian Bell, Michael Geyer, David Glickenstein, Amanda Fernandez, Juston Moore

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We explore the equivalence between neural networks and kernel methods by deriving the first exact representation of any finite-size parametric classification model trained with gradient descent as a kernel machine. We compare our exact representation to the well-known Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) and discuss approximation error relative to the NTK and other non-exact path kernel formulations. We experimentally demonstrate that the kernel can be computed for realistic networks up to machine precision. We use this exact kernel to show that our theoretical contribution can provide useful insights into the predictions made by neural networks, particularly the way in which they generalize.

arXiv comments
TAG-ML at ICML 2023 in Proceedings. 8 pages, 6 figures, proofs in Appendix
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.LGMachine Learning

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Sep 2023 to Sep 2023. Found in 1 HN submission from Sep 2023 to Sep 2023. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • See our re-examination of the kernel equivalence. Path kernels exactly measure how models learn as their understanding of data improves during training, and this can be expressed in terms of the gradients with regards to each trianing input: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.00824 We…

      bwbellmathView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.