HackerPapers

arXiv:2303.17579cs.CL

Multimodal Image-Text Matching Improves Retrieval-based Chest X-Ray Report Generation

Jaehwan Jeong, Katherine Tian, Andrew Li, Sina Hartung, Fardad Behzadi, Juan Calle, David Osayande, Michael Pohlen, Subathra Adithan, Pranav Rajpurkar

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Automated generation of clinically accurate radiology reports can improve patient care. Previous report generation methods that rely on image captioning models often generate incoherent and incorrect text due to their lack of relevant domain knowledge, while retrieval-based attempts frequently retrieve reports that are irrelevant to the input image. In this work, we propose Contrastive X-Ray REport Match (X-REM), a novel retrieval-based radiology report generation module that uses an image-text matching score to measure the similarity of a chest X-ray image and radiology report for report retrieval. We observe that computing the image-text matching score with a language-image model can effectively capture the fine-grained interaction between image and text that is often lost when using cosine similarity. X-REM outperforms multiple prior radiology report generation modules in terms of both natural language and clinical metrics. Human evaluation of the generated reports suggests that X-REM increased the number of zero-error reports and decreased the average error severity compared to the baseline retrieval approach. Our code is available at: https://github.com/rajpurkarlab/X-REM

arXiv comments
Journal reference
Medical Imaging with Deep Learning 2023
DOI
Subjects
cs.CLComputation and Language cs.AIArtificial Intelligence cs.CVComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Jul 2023 to Jul 2023.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • It is still not quite at a human level (radiologists prefer human reports in 60% of cases in blinded trials on the best of 3 models, corresponding to an ELO difference of 67 points; the worst model has an ELO difference of 130 compared to humans). The evaluation was done on 246…

      espadrineView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.