<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Multimodal Image-Text Matching Improves Retrieval-based Chest X-Ray Report Generation · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.17579/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.17579/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Multimodal Image-Text Matching Improves Retrieval-based Chest X-Ray Report Generation — mentioned by espadrine</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36890774</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2303.17579:36890774</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2023 08:54:50 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;It is still not quite at a human level (radiologists prefer human reports in 60% of cases in blinded trials on the best of 3 models, corresponding to an ELO difference of 67 points; the worst model has an ELO difference of 130 compared to humans). The evaluation was done on 246 X-rays, which is good; it would be better if they were not all chest X-rays (to see generality), and if there were more than only four radiologists from the same country. The achieved 0.25 clinically-significant errors is impressive, although it is only for the best of 3 models, which can incur bias; averaged across…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.17579/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
