arXiv:2303.09067cs.CL
Secret-Keeping in Question Answering
Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.
Abstract
Existing question-answering research focuses on unanswerable questions in the context of always providing an answer when a system can\dots but what about cases where a system {\bf should not} answer a question. This can either be to protect sensitive users or sensitive information. Many models expose sensitive information under interrogation by an adversarial user. We seek to determine if it is possible to teach a question-answering system to keep a specific fact secret. We design and implement a proof-of-concept architecture and through our evaluation determine that while possible, there are numerous directions for future research to reduce system paranoia (false positives), information leakage (false negatives) and extend the implementation of the work to more complex problems with preserving secrecy in the presence of information aggregation.
See https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.09067.pdf I have to admit that I am pretty skeptical of the "right to be forgotten" though. Our local bus company lost $750,000 to a gambling addict embezzler. People like that almost always reoffend if they have any access to money. People who use…
PaulHouleView on HNParent context