<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Secret-Keeping in Question Answering · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.09067/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.09067/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Secret-Keeping in Question Answering — mentioned by PaulHoule</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35259943</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2303.09067:35259943</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2023 12:20:23 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;See https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.09067.pdf I have to admit that I am pretty skeptical of the &amp;quot;right to be forgotten&amp;quot; though. Our local bus company lost $750,000 to a gambling addict embezzler. People like that almost always reoffend if they have any access to money. People who use their social skills as a weapon ought to be held accountable otherwise they will take advantage of people again and again.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.09067/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
