HackerPapers

arXiv:2301.06708astro-ph.IM

Antennas for low-frequency radio telescope of SKA

Agaram Raghunathan, Keerthipriya Satish, Arasi Sathyamurthy, T. Prabu, B. S. Girish, K. S. Srivani, Shiv K. Sethi

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

The low-frequency radio telescope of the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) is being built by the international radio astronomical community to (i) have orders of magnitude higher sensitivity and (ii) be able to map the sky several hundred times faster, than any other existing facilities over the frequency range of 50 - 350 MHz. The sensitivity of a radio telescope array is in general, dependent upon the number of electromagnetic sensors used to receive the sky signal. The total number of them is further constrained by the effects of mutual coupling between the sensor elements, allowable grating lobes in their radiation patterns, etc. The operating frequency band is governed by the desired spatial and spectral responses, acceptable sidelobe and backlobe levels, radiation efficiency, polarization purity and calibratability of sensors' response. This paper presents a brief review of several broadband antennas considered as potential candidates by various engineering groups across the globe, for the low-frequency radio telescope of SKA covering the frequency range of 50 - 350 MHz, on the basis of their suitability for conducting primary scientific objectives.

arXiv comments
14 pages, 33 figures, JoAA - Special issue on the SKA (2023) - Accepted for publication
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
astro-ph.IMInstrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Aug 2025 to Aug 2025.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • I'm not clear why not. The scale of the completed SKA-low (512*256 = 131,072 antennas, 1.8 meter lengths) is the same as that of Starlink itself. It's even less mass; the antenna parts alone, they are wire dipoles, they say they only weigh 1.6 kg each.…

      perihelionsView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.