<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Antennas for low-frequency radio telescope of SKA · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2301.06708/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2301.06708/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Antennas for low-frequency radio telescope of SKA — mentioned by perihelions</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44887681</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2301.06708:44887681</guid><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 12:34:51 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m not clear why not. The scale of the completed SKA-low (512*256 = 131,072 antennas, 1.8 meter lengths) is the same as that of Starlink itself. It&amp;#x27;s even less mass; the antenna parts alone, they are wire dipoles, they say they only weigh 1.6 kg each. https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.06708 Why can&amp;#x27;t humanity launch 2^17 small antennas into deep space, as a free-floating constellation?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2301.06708/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.IM</category></item></channel></rss>
