arXiv:2206.12378math.CO
A transient equivalence between Aldous-Broder and Wilson's algorithms and a two-stage framework for generating uniform spanning trees
Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.
Abstract
The $Aldous\text{-}Broder$ and $Wilson$ are two well-known algorithms to generate uniform spanning trees (USTs) based on random walks. This work studies their relationship while they construct random trees with the goal of reducing the total time required to build the spanning tree. Using the notion of $branches$ $-$ paths generated by the two algorithms on particular stopping times, we show that the trees built by the two algorithms when running on a complete graph are statistically equivalent on these stopping times. This leads to a hybrid algorithm that can generate uniform spanning trees of complete graphs faster than either of the two algorithms. An efficient two-stage framework is also proposed to explore this hybrid approach beyond complete graphs, showing its feasibility in various examples, including transitive graphs where it requires 25% less time than $Wilson$ to generate a UST.
> I also read that starting with Aldous Broder and then switching to Wilson's Algorithm (reasoning: Aldous Broder is slow at the end, Wilson's Algorithm is slow at the start) is faster than either. However, I haven't seen proof that this combination still results in a uniform…
ArcorannView on HNParent context