HackerPapers

arXiv:2109.12075cs.AI

Towards A Measure Of General Machine Intelligence

Gautham Venkatasubramanian, Sibesh Kar, Abhimanyu Singh, Shubham Mishra, Dushyant Yadav, Shreyansh Chandak

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

To build general-purpose artificial intelligence systems that can deal with unknown variables across unknown domains, we need benchmarks that measure how well these systems perform on tasks they have never seen before. A prerequisite for this is a measure of a task's generalization difficulty, or how dissimilar it is from the system's prior knowledge and experience. If the skill of an intelligence system in a particular domain is defined as it's ability to consistently generate a set of instructions (or programs) to solve tasks in that domain, current benchmarks do not quantitatively measure the efficiency of acquiring new skills, making it possible to brute-force skill acquisition by training with unlimited amounts of data and compute power. With this in mind, we first propose a common language of instruction, a programming language that allows the expression of programs in the form of directed acyclic graphs across a wide variety of real-world domains and computing platforms. Using programs generated in this language, we demonstrate a match-based method to both score performance and calculate the generalization difficulty of any given set of tasks. We use these to define a numeric benchmark called the generalization index, or the g-index, to measure and compare the skill-acquisition efficiency of any intelligence system on a set of real-world tasks. Finally, we evaluate the suitability of some well-known models as general intelligence systems by calculating their g-index scores.

arXiv comments
31 pages, 15 Figures, 3 Tables; Sample Data and g-index Reference Code at https://github.com/mayahq/g-index-benchmark; g-index toy environment at https://github.com/mayahq/flatland; version 2 added a section about the toy environment; version 3 compressed images to reduce file size; version 4 updated description of flatland toy environment
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.AIArtificial Intelligence cs.LGMachine Learning

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 2 comments across 2 threads, from Feb 2022 to Feb 2022.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • > To evaluate CoPilot, we should ask questions that are unusual enough they can't be answered through regurgitation of the training corpus. Exactly! It's great that Copilot can generate correct code for a given question, but we cannot gauge its full capability unless we try it…

      ahgamutView on HNParent context

    • I find almost every new advance in deep learning is accompanied by contrasting comments: it's either "AI will soon automate programming/<insert task here>", or "let me know when AI can actually do <some-difficult-task>". There are many views on this spectrum, but these two are…

      ahgamutView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.