arXiv:2103.06435cs.NE
Population-Based Evolution Optimizes a Meta-Learning Objective
Abstract
Meta-learning models, or models that learn to learn, have been a long-desired target for their ability to quickly solve new tasks. Traditional meta-learning methods can require expensive inner and outer loops, thus there is demand for algorithms that discover strong learners without explicitly searching for them. We draw parallels to the study of evolvable genomes in evolutionary systems -- genomes with a strong capacity to adapt -- and propose that meta-learning and adaptive evolvability optimize for the same objective: high performance after a set of learning iterations. We argue that population-based evolutionary systems with non-static fitness landscapes naturally bias towards high-evolvability genomes, and therefore optimize for populations with strong learning ability. We demonstrate this claim with a simple evolutionary algorithm, Population-Based Meta Learning (PBML), that consistently discovers genomes which display higher rates of improvement over generations, and can rapidly adapt to solve sparse fitness and robotic control tasks.
The referenced paper [1] invents a version of evolutionary algorithm where each gene is associated with a target "population ratio" which is modulated upwards or downwards by that gene's performance, and ultimately decides how many offspring that gene will have. The population…
markisusView on HNParent context
Agreed. The paper[0] it's purporting to review is interesting enough, but TFA makes some pretty confused statements about both EAs and metalearning. [0]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.06435
kristjanssonView on HNParent context