<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Population-Based Evolution Optimizes a Meta-Learning Objective · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2103.06435/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2103.06435/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Population-Based Evolution Optimizes a Meta-Learning Objective — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38730899</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2103.06435:38730899</guid><pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2023 04:21:01 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Population-Based Evolution Optimizes a Meta-Learning Objective&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 1 discussion reply on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2103.06435/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.NE</category></item><item><title>Population-Based Evolution Optimizes a Meta-Learning Objective — mentioned by kristjansson</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38730729</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2103.06435:38730729</guid><pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2023 03:45:04 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed. The paper[0] it&amp;#x27;s purporting to review is interesting enough, but TFA makes some pretty confused statements about both EAs and metalearning. [0]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.06435&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2103.06435/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.NE</category></item><item><title>Population-Based Evolution Optimizes a Meta-Learning Objective — mentioned by markisus</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38730598</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2103.06435:38730598</guid><pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2023 03:21:58 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The referenced paper [1] invents a version of evolutionary algorithm where each gene is associated with a target &amp;quot;population ratio&amp;quot; which is modulated upwards or downwards by that gene&amp;#x27;s performance, and ultimately decides how many offspring that gene will have. The population ratio is not really a ratio. It&amp;#x27;s just a float that represents the fiction that a particular genome represents a population of identical clones. A gene is deleted only if its population ratio falls below 0.0001. In this way, the culling decision is softened so that doing poorly on one round of fitness evaluation does…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2103.06435/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.NE</category></item></channel></rss>
